Surprised by the uncritical acceptance of events leading to the death of Raul Reyes, last weekend I sent an article to several friends of the Colombian writer Héctor Abad Faciolince Week magazine published that questioned the validity of the perception that anything goes. To my surprise the majority of responses that everything is worth nodding. All were legitimate mechanisms provided root out the guerrillas.
However, it is necessary to note that violence regardless of which side has and the supreme value that attempts to justify its need, is violence, and a slaughter like the one that killed Raul Reyes is no different to the massacres perpetrated by the guerrillas or the paramilitaries. In the same vein, the mutilation of a body at the suggestion of the Colombian Army, the case of Ivan Rios, has no major difference with the mutilations carried out by paramilitary or guerrilla groups. All these are acts of violence in the name of a "better future" and the support of the "good Colombians" eliminates those who are opposed to the default "course" that the country should follow. How is it possible that the Colombian state publicly condemn the violations of the laws of war committed by the guerrillas, but justified by the very triumphant smile.
Was not the Colombian state condemning the guerrillas for practice all forms of struggle?
Is not it precisely that the Colombian State's practice today?
Was not the Colombian state condemning the guerrillas for practice all forms of struggle?
Is not it precisely that the Colombian State's practice today?
It is necessary to note however, that contrary to the "furor" popular, are not new measures. Colombia once and test the anything goes when attacked a group of farmers who sought to defend the partisan violence of the time in Marquetalia and Patio Chiquito and the result, contrary to the intentions of government that government was the creation of the FARC ELN and the only thing that remains clear is fervently anti-FARC Colombia has not learned the lesson. That the country refuses to learn from its history and continues to repeat in a Nietzschean eternal return that as I said Deleuze is different each time it is repeated, as the years pass, the names of victims and executioners change, but the practices remain the same. And worst of all, it will remain the same, even when Colombia learn that a single nation is built on respect and adherence to the law, otherwise the children of the leaders of today are the fighters of tomorrow and victims of the excesses of today will be guerrilla paramilitary morning. If the Colombian state is actually intended to stop the rush of blood, this is not achieved slaughtering and butchering human beings for more than Raúl Reyes and Iván Ríos they are. In fact the little that has won Colombia with the death of those members of the FARC, is scrawny with what could have been advancing in the ways of peace if they had been captured instead of slaughtered and mutilated. But worse that although Colombia has chosen a path and has chosen the FARC as responsible for all the ills that afflict it, because it is easier to blame the FARC, the ELN and the paramilitaries to bring about the changes to end the social, political and economic support these groups.
0 comments:
Post a Comment